2004 Chrysler PT Cruiser vs. 2008 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2008 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chrysler PT Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chrysler PT Cruiser would be higher. At 2,499 cc, 2008 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 571 kg more than 2004 Chrysler PT Cruiser.
Because 2008 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Chrysler PT Cruiser. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Cherokee (343 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chrysler PT Cruiser. (339 Nm). This means 2008 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chrysler PT Cruiser.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chrysler PT Cruiser | 2008 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | Chrysler | Jeep |
Model | PT Cruiser | Cherokee |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2425 cc | 2499 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 343 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 17.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1407 kg | 1978 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 70 L |