2004 Chrysler PT Cruiser vs. 2010 Audi TT
To start off, 2010 Audi TT is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chrysler PT Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chrysler PT Cruiser would be higher. At 2,424 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler PT Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chrysler PT Cruiser (180 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2010 Audi TT. (168 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler PT Cruiser should accelerate faster than 2010 Audi TT.
Because 2010 Audi TT is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Chrysler PT Cruiser. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Audi TT (350 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chrysler PT Cruiser. (285 Nm). This means 2010 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chrysler PT Cruiser.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chrysler PT Cruiser | 2010 Audi TT | |
Make | Chrysler | Audi |
Model | PT Cruiser | TT |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2424 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4201 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1359 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2469 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 60 L |