2004 Chrysler Sebring vs. 1958 Ford 12 M
To start off, 2004 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,775 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chrysler Sebring (200 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 1958 Ford 12 M. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 1958 Ford 12 M. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 671 kg more than 1958 Ford 12 M. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1958 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chrysler Sebring | 1958 Ford 12 M | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Sebring | 12 M |
Year Released | 2004 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2775 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1566 kg | 895 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2500 mm |