2004 Chrysler Sebring vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2004 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,736 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chrysler Sebring (200 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 684 kg more than 1966 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chrysler Sebring (258 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm). This means 2004 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chrysler Sebring | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Triumph |
| Model | Sebring | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2736 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 91 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 258 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1854 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 64 L |
