2004 Chrysler Sebring vs. 1975 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2004 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1975 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 696 kg more than 2004 Chrysler Sebring.
Because 1975 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chrysler Sebring | 1975 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Chrysler | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Sebring | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2966 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1454 kg | 2150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3160 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 107 L |
