2004 Chrysler Sebring vs. 1982 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2004 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Camry. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Camry would be higher. At 2,735 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chrysler Sebring (200 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1982 Toyota Camry. (89 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 1982 Toyota Camry. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 496 kg more than 1982 Toyota Camry. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chrysler Sebring (258 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Toyota Camry. (143 Nm). This means 2004 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Toyota Camry.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chrysler Sebring | 1982 Toyota Camry | |
Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
Model | Sebring | Camry |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Body Type | Convertible | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2735 cc | 1832 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 258 Nm | 143 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 78 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1576 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2610 mm |