2004 Chrysler Sebring vs. 1986 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2004 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,735 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chrysler Sebring (200 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1986 Ford Mustang. (88 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 391 kg more than 1986 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chrysler Sebring (258 Nm) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Ford Mustang. (161 Nm). This means 2004 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chrysler Sebring | 1986 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Sebring | Mustang |
Year Released | 2004 | 1986 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2735 cc | 2294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 88 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 258 Nm | 161 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1576 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2560 mm |