2004 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2000 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 2004 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 SsangYong Musso. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 SsangYong Musso would be higher. At 2,735 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chrysler Sebring (200 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2000 SsangYong Musso. (148 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 2000 SsangYong Musso. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 SsangYong Musso weights approximately 254 kg more than 2004 Chrysler Sebring.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 SsangYong Musso (307 Nm) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chrysler Sebring. (258 Nm). This means 2000 SsangYong Musso will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chrysler Sebring.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chrysler Sebring | 2000 SsangYong Musso | |
| Make | Chrysler | SsangYong |
| Model | Sebring | Musso |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2735 cc | 2295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 258 Nm | 307 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 90.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 88.4 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 10.4:1 |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1576 kg | 1830 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1740 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 73 L |
