2004 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2002 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2004 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Smart ForTwo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Smart ForTwo would be higher. At 2,735 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chrysler Sebring (200 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 2002 Smart ForTwo. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 2002 Smart ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 771 kg more than 2002 Smart ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chrysler Sebring (258 Nm) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Smart ForTwo. (95 Nm). This means 2004 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Smart ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chrysler Sebring | 2002 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Chrysler | Smart |
Model | Sebring | ForTwo |
Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2735 cc | 696 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 258 Nm | 95 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 66.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 67 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1576 kg | 805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1520 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 1820 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 4.7 L/100km |