2004 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2002 Suzuki F1
To start off, 2004 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Suzuki F1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Suzuki F1 would be higher. At 2,423 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chrysler Sebring (150 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki F1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki F1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Suzuki F1 weights approximately 18 kg more than 2004 Chrysler Sebring.
Because 2002 Suzuki F1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Suzuki F1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chrysler Sebring (226 Nm) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki F1. (106 Nm). This means 2004 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki F1.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chrysler Sebring | 2002 Suzuki F1 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Suzuki |
| Model | Sebring | F1 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2423 cc | 1995 cc |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 226 Nm | 106 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1452 kg | 1470 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 45 L |
