2004 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2005 GMC Safari
To start off, 2005 GMC Safari is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chrysler Sebring (200 HP) has 10 more horse power than 2005 GMC Safari. (190 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 2005 GMC Safari. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Safari weights approximately 465 kg more than 2004 Chrysler Sebring.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Safari (339 Nm) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chrysler Sebring. (258 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Safari will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chrysler Sebring.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chrysler Sebring | 2005 GMC Safari | |
Make | Chrysler | GMC |
Model | Sebring | Safari |
Year Released | 2004 | 2005 |
Body Type | Convertible | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2735 cc | 4294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 190 HP |
Torque | 258 Nm | 339 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 9.2:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1576 kg | 2041 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.4 L/100km | 14 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 17 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 15.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 102 L |