2004 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2006 Isuzu I-280
To start off, 2006 Isuzu I-280 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 2,770 cc, 2006 Isuzu I-280 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chrysler Sebring (200 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2006 Isuzu I-280. (175 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 2006 Isuzu I-280.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chrysler Sebring (258 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu I-280. (251 Nm). This means 2004 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu I-280.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chrysler Sebring | 2006 Isuzu I-280 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Isuzu |
| Model | Sebring | I-280 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2737 cc | 2770 cc |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 175 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 258 Nm | 251 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 5270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3200 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 8.4 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 74 L |
