2004 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2006 Rover 75
To start off, 2006 Rover 75 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 2,735 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chrysler Sebring (200 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2006 Rover 75. (175 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 2006 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 206 kg more than 2006 Rover 75. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chrysler Sebring (258 Nm) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Rover 75. (240 Nm). This means 2004 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chrysler Sebring | 2006 Rover 75 | |
Make | Chrysler | Rover |
Model | Sebring | 75 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2735 cc | 2495 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 258 Nm | 240 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 82.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 10.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1576 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 9.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 65 L |