2004 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2007 Ford E-150
To start off, 2007 Ford E-150 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford E-150 (226 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2004 Chrysler Sebring. (200 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2004 Chrysler Sebring.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford E-150 (388 Nm) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chrysler Sebring. (258 Nm). This means 2007 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chrysler Sebring.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chrysler Sebring | 2007 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Sebring | E-150 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2007 |
Body Type | Convertible | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2775 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 226 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 258 Nm | 388 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 90 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.4 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 132 L |