2004 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2007 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2007 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 3,776 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Jeep Wrangler (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2004 Chrysler Sebring. (200 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2004 Chrysler Sebring.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Jeep Wrangler (321 Nm) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chrysler Sebring. (258 Nm). This means 2007 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chrysler Sebring.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chrysler Sebring | 2007 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Chrysler | Jeep |
Model | Sebring | Wrangler |
Year Released | 2004 | 2007 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2735 cc | 3776 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 258 Nm | 321 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 90.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.4 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 70 L |