2004 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2007 Lincoln MKX
To start off, 2007 Lincoln MKX is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Lincoln MKX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Lincoln MKX (265 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 2004 Chrysler Sebring. (200 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Lincoln MKX should accelerate faster than 2004 Chrysler Sebring.
Because 2007 Lincoln MKX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Chrysler Sebring. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Lincoln MKX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Lincoln MKX (339 Nm) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chrysler Sebring. (258 Nm). This means 2007 Lincoln MKX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chrysler Sebring.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chrysler Sebring | 2007 Lincoln MKX | |
Make | Chrysler | Lincoln |
Model | Sebring | MKX |
Year Released | 2004 | 2007 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2775 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 258 Nm | 339 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 91.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 86.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 10.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.4 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 72 L |