2004 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2009 Ford Fusion
To start off, 2009 Ford Fusion is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 2,735 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chrysler Sebring (200 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 2009 Ford Fusion. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Fusion. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 399 kg more than 2009 Ford Fusion. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chrysler Sebring (258 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Fusion. (205 Nm). This means 2004 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Fusion.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chrysler Sebring | 2009 Ford Fusion | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Sebring | Fusion |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2735 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 258 Nm | 205 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 88 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1576 kg | 1177 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 4.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 45 L |