2004 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2010 Mitsubishi Eclipse
To start off, 2010 Mitsubishi Eclipse is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 2,735 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chrysler Sebring (200 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 2010 Mitsubishi Eclipse. (162 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 2010 Mitsubishi Eclipse. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mitsubishi Eclipse weights approximately 16 kg more than 2004 Chrysler Sebring.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chrysler Sebring (258 Nm) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mitsubishi Eclipse. (219 Nm). This means 2004 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mitsubishi Eclipse.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chrysler Sebring | 2010 Mitsubishi Eclipse | |
Make | Chrysler | Mitsubishi |
Model | Sebring | Eclipse |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2735 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 162 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 258 Nm | 219 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1576 kg | 1592 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4582 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1834 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1382 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2576 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.4 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 67 L |