2004 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2010 Tata Nano
To start off, 2010 Tata Nano is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chrysler Sebring (200 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 2010 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 2010 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 854 kg more than 2010 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chrysler Sebring (278 Nm) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Tata Nano. (48 Nm). This means 2004 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Tata Nano.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chrysler Sebring | 2010 Tata Nano | |
Make | Chrysler | Tata |
Model | Sebring | Nano |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 624 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 278 Nm | 48 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 91 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1454 kg | 600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3099 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1495 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1652 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2230 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 4.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 37 L |