2004 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2013 Ford Mustang

To start off, 2013 Ford Mustang is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Mustang (301 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 2004 Chrysler Sebring. (200 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2004 Chrysler Sebring. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Mustang weights approximately 137 kg more than 2004 Chrysler Sebring. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2013 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford Mustang (380 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chrysler Sebring. (278 Nm). This means 2013 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chrysler Sebring.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Chrysler Sebring 2013 Ford Mustang
Make Chrysler Ford
Model Sebring Mustang
Year Released 2004 2013
Body Type Coupe Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2966 cc 3700 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 200 HP 301 HP
Engine RPM 6400 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 278 Nm 380 Nm
Engine Bore Size 91 mm 95 mm
Engine Stroke Size 76 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.1:1 10.5:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1454 kg 1591 kg
Vehicle Length 4880 mm 4778 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 2035 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1412 mm
Wheelbase Size 2620 mm 2720 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 8.1 L/100km 6.9 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 11.8 L/100km 11.1 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 62 L 61 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]