2004 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2013 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2013 Ford Taurus is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Taurus (360 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 2004 Chrysler Sebring. (201 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 2004 Chrysler Sebring. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Taurus weights approximately 488 kg more than 2004 Chrysler Sebring. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Ford Taurus is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Chrysler Sebring. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford Taurus will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford Taurus (475 Nm) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chrysler Sebring. (258 Nm). This means 2013 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chrysler Sebring.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chrysler Sebring | 2013 Ford Taurus | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Sebring | Taurus |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2737 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 360 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 258 Nm | 475 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 10.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1485 kg | 1973 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 5154 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2177 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2868 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.4 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 72 L |