2004 Chrysler Voyager vs. 1996 Acura TL
To start off, 2004 Chrysler Voyager is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Acura TL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Acura TL would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Acura TL (200 HP) has 50 more horse power than 2004 Chrysler Voyager. (150 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 2004 Chrysler Voyager.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chrysler Voyager | 1996 Acura TL | |
Make | Chrysler | Acura |
Model | Voyager | TL |
Year Released | 2004 | 1996 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2737 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1405 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2840 mm |