2004 Chrysler Voyager vs. 2009 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chrysler Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chrysler Voyager would be higher. At 2,737 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chrysler Voyager (150 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2009 Renault Clio. (111 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Voyager should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chrysler Voyager weights approximately 728 kg more than 2009 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chrysler Voyager (367 Nm @ 2100 RPM) has 216 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Renault Clio. (151 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2004 Chrysler Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chrysler Voyager | 2009 Renault Clio | |
Make | Chrysler | Renault |
Model | Voyager | Clio |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2737 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 367 Nm | 151 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2100 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.5:1 | 9.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1943 kg | 1215 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.4 L/100km | 7.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 55 L |