2004 Chrysler Voyager vs. 2010 Aston Martin One-77

To start off, 2010 Aston Martin One-77 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chrysler Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chrysler Voyager would be higher. At 7,300 cc (12 cylinders), 2010 Aston Martin One-77 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Aston Martin One-77 (750 HP) has 578 more horse power than 2004 Chrysler Voyager. (172 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Aston Martin One-77 should accelerate faster than 2004 Chrysler Voyager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chrysler Voyager weights approximately 356 kg more than 2010 Aston Martin One-77.

Because 2010 Aston Martin One-77 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Aston Martin One-77. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Aston Martin One-77 (750 Nm) has 472 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chrysler Voyager. (278 Nm). This means 2010 Aston Martin One-77 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chrysler Voyager. 2004 Chrysler Voyager has automatic transmission and 2010 Aston Martin One-77 has manual transmission. 2010 Aston Martin One-77 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Chrysler Voyager will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: