2004 Chrysler Voyager vs. 2010 Volvo C70
To start off, 2010 Volvo C70 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chrysler Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chrysler Voyager would be higher. At 3,301 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chrysler Voyager weights approximately 246 kg more than 2010 Volvo C70.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo C70 (400 Nm @ 1250 RPM) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chrysler Voyager. (278 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chrysler Voyager.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chrysler Voyager | 2010 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | Voyager | C70 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3301 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 278 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1986 kg | 1740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4582 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1836 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 60 L |