2004 Citroen C 15 vs. 2000 Jaguar F-Type
To start off, 2004 Citroen C 15 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jaguar F-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jaguar F-Type would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar F-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar F-Type (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 331 more horse power than 2004 Citroen C 15. (59 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar F-Type should accelerate faster than 2004 Citroen C 15. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar F-Type weights approximately 805 kg more than 2004 Citroen C 15. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Jaguar F-Type is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Jaguar F-Type. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Citroen C 15, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Citroen C 15 | 2000 Jaguar F-Type | |
Make | Citroen | Jaguar |
Model | C 15 | F-Type |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 4194 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 390 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Top Speed | 196 km/hour | 251 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2390 mm |