2004 Citroen C 15 vs. 2010 Holden Caprice
To start off, 2010 Holden Caprice is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Citroen C 15. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Citroen C 15 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Caprice (278 HP) has 219 more horse power than 2004 Citroen C 15. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 2004 Citroen C 15.
Because 2010 Holden Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Citroen C 15, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Caprice (350 Nm) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Citroen C 15. (120 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Citroen C 15.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Citroen C 15 | 2010 Holden Caprice | |
Make | Citroen | Holden |
Model | C 15 | Caprice |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 278 HP |
Torque | 120 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.7 L/100km | 9.9 L/100km |