2004 Citroen C 15 vs. 2011 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2011 Volvo XC60 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Citroen C 15. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Citroen C 15 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (5 cylinders), 2011 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 926 kg more than 2004 Citroen C 15.
Because 2011 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Citroen C 15. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Citroen C 15 | 2011 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | C 15 | XC60 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1921 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1712 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2748 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 70 L |