2004 Citroen C2 vs. 1967 McLaren M1C
To start off, 2004 Citroen C2 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 McLaren M1C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 McLaren M1C would be higher. At 5,818 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 McLaren M1C is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1967 McLaren M1C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 McLaren M1C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Citroen C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Citroen C2 | 1967 McLaren M1C | |
| Make | Citroen | McLaren |
| Model | C2 | M1C |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1967 |
| Engine Size | 1585 cc | 5818 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
