2004 Citroen C2 vs. 1968 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2004 Citroen C2 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1968 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mazda Cosmo (94 HP) has 22 more horse power than 2004 Citroen C2. (72 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 2004 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Citroen C2 weights approximately 50 kg more than 1968 Mazda Cosmo.
Because 1968 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Citroen C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Citroen C2. (118 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1968 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Citroen C2 | 1968 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | C2 | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2004 | 1968 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 94 HP |
Torque | 118 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.4:1 |
Top Speed | 169 km/hour | 200 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 57 L |