2004 Citroen C2 vs. 1979 Mazda 626
To start off, 2004 Citroen C2 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Citroen C2 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Citroen C2 weights approximately 10 kg more than 1979 Mazda 626.
Because 1979 Mazda 626 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Mazda 626. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Citroen C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Citroen C2 has automatic transmission and 1979 Mazda 626 has manual transmission. 1979 Mazda 626 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Citroen C2 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Citroen C2 | 1979 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | C2 | 626 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1055 kg | 1045 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2520 mm |