2004 Citroen C2 vs. 1979 Volvo 66

To start off, 2004 Citroen C2 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Citroen C2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Citroen C2 (106 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1979 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Citroen C2 should accelerate faster than 1979 Volvo 66.

Because 1979 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Citroen C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Citroen C2 (116 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2004 Citroen C2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Volvo 66.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Citroen C2 1979 Volvo 66
Make Citroen Volvo
Model C2 66
Year Released 2004 1979
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1587 cc 1289 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 106 HP 56 HP
Engine RPM 5750 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 116 Nm 94 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 78.6 mm 73 mm
Engine Stroke Size 82 mm 77 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 8.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 3670 mm 3910 mm
Vehicle Width 1670 mm 1550 mm