2004 Citroen C2 vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2004 Citroen C2 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Zastava 102 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Citroen C2 (59 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Citroen C2 should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Citroen C2 weights approximately 160 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1981 Zastava 102 (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Citroen C2. (94 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1981 Zastava 102 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Citroen C2 | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Citroen | Zastava |
Model | C2 | 102 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 1124 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 94 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2160 mm |