2004 Citroen C2 vs. 1986 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 2004 Citroen C2 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,354 cc, 1986 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Mazda RX-7 (185 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 2004 Citroen C2. (59 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 2004 Citroen C2.
Because 1986 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Citroen C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Mazda RX-7 (246 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Citroen C2. (94 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1986 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Citroen C2 | 1986 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | C2 | RX-7 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1986 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1123 cc | 2354 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 94 Nm | 246 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2430 mm |