2004 Citroen C2 vs. 1992 Mazda 626
To start off, 2004 Citroen C2 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,840 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Citroen C2 (123 HP) has 17 more horse power than 1992 Mazda 626. (106 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Citroen C2 should accelerate faster than 1992 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mazda 626 weights approximately 62 kg more than 2004 Citroen C2.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Mazda 626 (157 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Citroen C2. (150 Nm). This means 1992 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Citroen C2 | 1992 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | C2 | 626 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1992 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1585 cc | 1840 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 106 HP |
Torque | 150 Nm | 157 Nm |
Top Speed | 203 km/hour | 185 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1083 kg | 1145 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2620 mm |