2004 Citroen C2 vs. 1997 Mazda Midge
To start off, 2004 Citroen C2 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 1,585 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Citroen C2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Citroen C2 (123 HP) has 56 more horse power than 1997 Mazda Midge. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Citroen C2 should accelerate faster than 1997 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Citroen C2 weights approximately 117 kg more than 1997 Mazda Midge. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Citroen C2 (150 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2004 Citroen C2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Citroen C2 | 1997 Mazda Midge | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | C2 | Midge |
Year Released | 2004 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1585 cc | 1322 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 150 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1083 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1400 mm |