2004 Citroen C2 vs. 2000 Oldsmobile SS
To start off, 2004 Citroen C2 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Oldsmobile SS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Oldsmobile SS would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Oldsmobile SS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Oldsmobile SS (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 2004 Citroen C2. (106 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile SS should accelerate faster than 2004 Citroen C2.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Oldsmobile SS (318 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 202 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Citroen C2. (116 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2000 Oldsmobile SS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Citroen C2 | 2000 Oldsmobile SS | |
Make | Citroen | Oldsmobile |
Model | C2 | SS |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 116 Nm | 318 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1900 mm |