2004 Citroen C2 vs. 2009 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2009 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Citroen C2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Citroen C2 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan X-Trail (137 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 2004 Citroen C2. (59 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 2004 Citroen C2.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan X-Trail (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Citroen C2. (94 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Citroen C2 | 2009 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Citroen | Nissan |
Model | C2 | X-Trail |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1124 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 137 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 94 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 158 km/hour | 182 km/hour |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.2 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 65 L |