2004 Citroen C2 vs. 2012 Opel Combo
To start off, 2012 Opel Combo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Citroen C2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Citroen C2 would be higher. At 1,364 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Opel Combo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Opel Combo (89 HP) has 17 more horse power than 2004 Citroen C2. (72 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Opel Combo should accelerate faster than 2004 Citroen C2.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Opel Combo (126 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Citroen C2. (118 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2012 Opel Combo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Citroen C2 | 2012 Opel Combo | |
Make | Citroen | Opel |
Model | C2 | Combo |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 89 HP |
Torque | 118 Nm | 126 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 73.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 80.6 mm |
Top Speed | 169 km/hour | 164 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 13.6 seconds | 14 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.2 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 52 L |