2004 Citroen C2 vs. 2013 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Citroen C2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Citroen C2 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro (420 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 297 more horse power than 2004 Citroen C2. (123 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2004 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 668 kg more than 2004 Citroen C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Citroen C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro (569 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 419 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Citroen C2. (150 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2013 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Citroen C2 | 2013 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Citroen | Chevrolet |
Model | C2 | Camaro |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1585 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 420 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 569 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.5 mm | 103 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 92 mm |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 8.3 seconds | 5.9 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1083 kg | 1751 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4836 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1918 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1377 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2852 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 5.4 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.3 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.9 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 72 L |