2004 Citroen C2 vs. 2013 Dodge CHARGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge CHARGER is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Citroen C2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Citroen C2 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Dodge CHARGER is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (288 HP @ 6350 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 2004 Citroen C2. (123 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Dodge CHARGER should accelerate faster than 2004 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge CHARGER weights approximately 730 kg more than 2004 Citroen C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Dodge CHARGER is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Dodge CHARGER. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Citroen C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (353 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Citroen C2. (150 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2013 Dodge CHARGER will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Citroen C2. 2013 Dodge CHARGER has automatic transmission and 2004 Citroen C2 has manual transmission. 2004 Citroen C2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Dodge CHARGER will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Citroen C2 | 2013 Dodge CHARGER | |
Make | Citroen | Dodge |
Model | C2 | CHARGER |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1585 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 288 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6350 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 353 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.5 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 83 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 8-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1083 kg | 1813 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 5077 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1482 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 3052 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 5.4 L/100km | 6.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.3 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 72 L |