2004 Citroen C2 vs. 2013 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2013 Ford Mustang is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Citroen C2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Citroen C2 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Mustang (301 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 195 more horse power than 2004 Citroen C2. (106 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2004 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Mustang weights approximately 595 kg more than 2004 Citroen C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Citroen C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford Mustang (380 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 264 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Citroen C2. (116 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2013 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Citroen C2. 2004 Citroen C2 has automatic transmission and 2013 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 2013 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Citroen C2 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Citroen C2 | 2013 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | C2 | Mustang |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 301 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 116 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.6 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1055 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4778 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2035 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1425 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 61 L |