2004 Citroen C2 vs. 2013 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2013 Toyota Matrix is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Citroen C2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Citroen C2 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Matrix (156 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2004 Citroen C2. (123 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 2004 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 397 kg more than 2004 Citroen C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Toyota Matrix is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Citroen C2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Matrix will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota Matrix (220 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Citroen C2. (150 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2013 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Citroen C2. 2013 Toyota Matrix has automatic transmission and 2004 Citroen C2 has manual transmission. 2004 Citroen C2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Toyota Matrix will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Citroen C2 | 2013 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Citroen | Toyota |
| Model | C2 | Matrix |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1585 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 156 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.5 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 96 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 4-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1083 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4365 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1765 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2600 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 5.4 L/100km | 7.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 9.3 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 50 L |
