2004 Citroen C2 vs. 2013 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC60 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Citroen C2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Citroen C2 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo XC60 (296 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 2004 Citroen C2. (123 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster than 2004 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 835 kg more than 2004 Citroen C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Citroen C2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo XC60 (441 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 291 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Citroen C2. (150 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2013 Volvo XC60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Citroen C2 | 2013 Volvo XC60 | |
| Make | Citroen | Volvo |
| Model | C2 | XC60 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1585 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 296 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 441 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.5 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 93 mm |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 8.3 seconds | 8.9 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1083 kg | 1918 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4627 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1891 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1713 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2774 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 5.4 L/100km | 8.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 9.3 L/100km | 12.1 L/100km |
