2004 Citroen C3 vs. 1958 Lotus 16
To start off, 2004 Citroen C3 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Lotus 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Lotus 16 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Lotus 16 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Lotus 16 (238 HP) has 166 more horse power than 2004 Citroen C3. (72 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Lotus 16 should accelerate faster than 2004 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Citroen C3 weights approximately 661 kg more than 1958 Lotus 16.
Because 1958 Lotus 16 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Lotus 16. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Citroen C3 | 1958 Lotus 16 | |
Make | Citroen | Lotus |
Model | C3 | 16 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1958 |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 238 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1211 kg | 550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 3510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2260 mm |