2004 Citroen C3 vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2004 Citroen C3 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1967 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2004 Citroen C3. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 2004 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Citroen C3 weights approximately 245 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Citroen C3 (143 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2004 Citroen C3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Citroen C3 | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | C3 | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2004 | 1967 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1359 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 143 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 57 L |