2004 Citroen C3 vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2004 Citroen C3 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1967 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2004 Citroen C3. (87 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 2004 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Citroen C3 weights approximately 110 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 133 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Citroen C3 | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | C3 | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2004 | 1967 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 57 L |