2004 Citroen C3 vs. 1968 Isuzu Bellel
To start off, 2004 Citroen C3 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 1,991 cc, 1968 Isuzu Bellel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Isuzu Bellel (81 HP) has 9 more horse power than 2004 Citroen C3. (72 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Isuzu Bellel should accelerate faster than 2004 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Isuzu Bellel weights approximately 84 kg more than 2004 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Isuzu Bellel (162 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Citroen C3. (110 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1968 Isuzu Bellel will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Citroen C3 | 1968 Isuzu Bellel | |
| Make | Citroen | Isuzu |
| Model | C3 | Bellel |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1360 cc | 1991 cc |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 81 HP |
| Torque | 110 Nm | 162 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1211 kg | 1295 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 40 L |
