2004 Citroen C3 vs. 1996 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 2004 Citroen C3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 2,615 cc, 1996 Mazda RX-01 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda RX-01 (217 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 2004 Citroen C3. (108 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 2004 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Citroen C3 weights approximately 40 kg more than 1996 Mazda RX-01.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mazda RX-01 (220 Nm @ 6000 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Citroen C3. (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1996 Mazda RX-01 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Citroen C3 | 1996 Mazda RX-01 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | C3 | RX-01 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 2615 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 8500 RPM |
Torque | 147 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 55 L |