2004 Citroen C3 vs. 2006 Isuzu I-350
To start off, 2006 Isuzu I-350 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Citroen C3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Citroen C3 would be higher. At 3,458 cc, 2006 Isuzu I-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Isuzu I-350 (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 2004 Citroen C3. (108 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu I-350 should accelerate faster than 2004 Citroen C3.
Because 2006 Isuzu I-350 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Citroen C3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu I-350 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Isuzu I-350 (305 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Citroen C3. (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Isuzu I-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Citroen C3 | 2006 Isuzu I-350 | |
Make | Citroen | Isuzu |
Model | C3 | I-350 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 3458 cc |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 147 Nm | 305 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.5 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 74 L |